Thanks to modern computing, multi-channel dry contact arrays and high-resolution image processing, Ultrasonic Tomography (UT) imaging technology is arguably the most superior imaging for defect assessment, investigation of anomalies and quality control in Concrete with unique capabilities to image deeper (thicker) and clearer than pulse radar GPR technologies, though Concrete GPRs have their own place and purpose in the industry.
Technology Standard Ultrasonic Tomography (UT) Imaging in accordance with ASTM C 597, 2016 “Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete and related standards BSI 1881 – Part 203, 1986, ASTM E 114-95, 920, 1995.



Unlike Ultrasonics, GPR based technologies are electromagnetic in nature, suffer severe attenuation by increase in Conductivity (number of Steel reinforcement layers) and at worst, may be rendered ineffective in Steel Fibre reinforced Concrete that’s increasingly being used in most heavy-duty precast structures. Hence the versatility and efficiency of Ultrasonic technology.
3.1.1 Justification of method
The high-resolution Ultrasonic Tomography (UT) imaging offer multi-dimensional imaging options. The Ultrasonic Tomography (UT) imaging offers options including: [2D/3D], [B-scan, C-Scan, D-Scan can be produced to maximise anomaly illumination and resolution.

The views on the three orthogonal planes have formal names as shown in left figure above.
The user can look at specific “slices” through 3-D model by defining the Z-coordinate for a C-scan image, the Y- coordinate for a B-scan image, and the X- coordinate for a D-scan image. Results are presented relevant to objectives and finely interpreted for further engineering assessment.